Read Article Read Entire Edition Read Archived Editions Coatings Solutions: Summer 2008 Edition
MARKETS WE SERVE
Bridge & Highway
Power Generation
Food & Beverage
General Industrial
Industrial Painting Contractors
Marine & Offshore
Petrochemical
Pharmaceutical
Pulp & Paper
Rail
Steel Fabrication
Water & Wastewater
Industrial Flooring
BROWSE KEYWORD SEARCH
 
Select the right Coating System to meet the service conditions & performance specifications of your project.
You can contact us via email and our experts will be happy to assist you.

+ Sales Inquiry
+ Technical Support
+ Customer Service
Stay Informed with the latest news & updates from Sherwin-Williams.
Industrial & Marine Home | Coating Solutions Archived Issues | Spring 2003 Issue Home

For Maintenance Painting

New coatings technologies reduce downtime and application costs

By Dave Schutz
Product Information Specialist
The Sherwin-Williams Company

Choosing protective coatings for the wide range of structures and exposure conditions in a plant can be a challenge for any specifier. Extreme humidity, harsh chemical exposure, lighting and cleaning methods, for example, can vary widely from one area to the next in any industrial plant.

But coatings specifiers can effectively manage the task by following this five-step system:

  • Establish plant zones;
  • Classify corrosive environments;
  • Analyze all application considerations;
  • Consider past performance of coating options, using case histories, comparative studies and test results as predictive tools
  • Look closely at new coating technologies, such as waterborne, surface-tolerant, low-temperature and dryfall coatings.
Establish and map plant zones. Start with a thorough analysis of the service conditions of all coated structures. To make this task more manageable, the facility and/or structures being protected should be sectioned into zones. Create maps that delineate zone boundaries and identify each structure within a zone.

Classify corrosive environments. In general, look to classify your corrosive environments into the following simple categories: normal, light, moderate or severe. To do so, start by identifying the type of material to be coated, such as carbon steel, galvanized metal, concrete, plastic or wood. For steel substrates, visual inspection of the steel surface using ASTM D610, Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces, is useful.

Environmental variables that contribute to corrosion include condensation, humidity, UV light, wet/dry cycling, temperature cycling, abrasion, immersion, and the presence of harsh chemicals and solvents. These variables frequently have a synergistic effect upon one another, multiplying corrosion potential.

To assist specifiers in classifying corrosive environments and choosing which protective coating system to use in a particular plant area, the Steel Structures Painting Council (SSPC) developed its Environmental Zones Painting Systems, which identifies 12 Environmental Zones, from 0 (interior exposure) to 3E (severe chemical exposure). Along with a description of each zone, the reader will find a recommended coating system suitable for use in each area.

Analyze all application considerations. Application considerations can have a significant effect on coatings specification. For example, will Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations affect coatings selections for the zone in question? Can the surface be properly prepared to accept the recommended coating system, or, if there are limits on surface preparation, would an alternative system provide better protection? Will production continue while painting is in progress? Will plant workers be present in adjacent areas? Will plant safety be influenced? What physical limitations may impede coating application?

To help plant specifiers evaluate all of these variables, industrial painting contractors and coatings manufacturers may be called upon to make recommendations. Today there are many new coatings that require less labor to apply, minimize disruption to the plant and shorten downtime.

Consider case histories, comparative studies and test results. Predicting how a particular coating will perform under site-specific conditions is extremely important. Case histories and comparative studies aid in this process. Results from accelerated laboratory exposure tests are also useful, although not all accelerated tests provide meaningful information. For example, the longstanding salt-fog method (ASTM B 117) has been found to be particularly poor at forecasting coating performance. While no single exposure test will duplicate actual atmospheric conditions exactly, the newly adopted cyclic corrosion test (ASTM D 5894) offers a much-improved technique for comparing relative durability and service life of protective coatings.

Look closely at new coatings technologies. Low-odor, high flash points and easy cleanup are among the characteristics that make waterbornes attractive, downtime-reducing coatings options for many specifiers. Thanks to new polymers, the coatings are also chemical, abrasion and moisture- resistant. They apply easily and can be applied directly to bare steel or existing coatings.

For light to moderate industrial uses, acrylic waterborne coatings are rapidly growing popular. Noted for their excellent exterior color and gloss retention, acrylic resins are transparent, yet provide excellent adhesion and hide qualities. Since their main polymer chain is a carbon-to-carbon single bond, they are relatively inert and not as susceptible to chemical change as many other linkages, making them highly durable.

Also for light to moderate industrial uses, waterborne epoxies have overcome temperature, humidity and performance-related drawbacks of past products. Waterborne epoxies can be applied in temperatures as low as 40 degrees F and offer corrosion, chemical, impact and abrasion resistance comparable to solvent-based products.

New technologies have helped make waterborne urethanes appropriate for moderate to severe industrial uses. Urethane technologies have resulted in a coating that uses a conventional resin with a water reducible polyol rather than an emulsion technology. This creates a film that is very flexible and dense, and provides excellent color and gloss retention on exterior surfaces.

SURFACE-TOLERANT COATINGS
The high cost of surface preparation and the time required for paint removal — particularly for complete removal of lead-based paint — can contribute greatly to the cost of maintenance painting, not to mention extended downtime. Surface-tolerant coatings — typically high-solids epoxies or epoxy mastics — minimize the need for surface preparation without compromising coating performance.

Penetrating surface-tolerant primers work by penetrating existing rust to create a “tight” surface prior to subsequent coats. These coatings may be applied over white rusted and weathered zinc rich coatings, and can be used as high-performance primer/sealers for masonry surfaces. Penetrating surface-tolerant primers are generally applied at 2-3 mils dft.

Surface-tolerant primers are sound choices in manufacturing environments where the presence of blast particles in the air can damage sensitive equipment, thereby eliminating a conventional means of surface preparation. After hand-tool or power-tool cleaning to SSPC SP-2 and 3, the primer is generally followed by a high-performance topcoat. LOW-TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE-CURED COATINGS
When maintenance painting during cold weather is unavoidable, moisturecured urethanes, cold-cured modified epoxies and mastics and inorganic zinc primers are able to cure efficiently and form strong bonds to substrates.

Moisture-cured urethane systems are, in fact, one of the more versatile coating systems available for steel substrates. The systems are surface tolerant, quick drying and applicator friendly.

Although generally higher priced than most industrial coatings, moisture-cured urethanes are capturing a growing share of new construction projects, particularly when longterm performance and superior color and gloss retention are required.

Power-tool cleaning is often the only means of surface preparation required for these types of urethanes. DRYFALL COATINGS
Dryfall coatings were developed to be spray-applied, with any overspray drying to a powdery substance before the spray reaches the ground. The paint droplet is transformed to dust within eight to ten feet at 77 degrees F and 50 percent relative humidity.

Because the resulting dust can be easily swept away, job site cleanup can be fast, easy and labor-saving.

Typically specified for use on ceilings and walls of commercial and institutional buildings, the most advanced dryfall coatings are formulated not only to minimize the labor involved in job-site cleanup, but also to reduce the labor associated with coatings application.

There are two types of dryfalls available — standard-grade dryfalls, which provide two-coat coverage, and the new, premiumgrade dryfalls, which require only half the amount of material to achieve the same hiding as their older counterparts. With just one pass of a spray gun, sufficient opacity can be achieved, even on new substrates, due to the high pigment content of these coatings. In addition, the newer dryfall formulations offer excellent hiding even when wet, further eliminating the temptation to apply several unnecessary coats of paint.

Dryfall coatings can be applied to steel, galvanized steel, aluminum, concrete, drywall, wood and previously painted surfaces. Surface preparation and recommended primer should be performed as specified by the manufacturer.

© 2008 The Sherwin-Williams Company